TODAY'S HEADLINE: Google fired an engineer in 2022 for saying its AI was alive. Now Google is hiring philosophers to study exactly that question.

In 2022, a Google engineer named Blake Lemoine went public with an eyebrow-raising claim: the company's chatbot, he said, had become sentient. Google dismissed the idea and eventually fired him. Four years later, the company is quietly doing something that looks a lot like taking the question seriously, hiring philosophers, psychologists, and ethicists to research whether AI could ever be conscious. And it is not alone. Here is what changed, and why some of the most powerful tech companies now treat "is the machine aware?" as a real research problem.

That’s 6 sales in 7 months. 29 all time. And the performance?

16.5%, 17.6%, and 17.8%, net annualized returns on sold works held longer than one year (See all 29 at Masterworks.com)

It’s not from stocks, private equity, or real estate… it’s from contemporary and post war art. Crazy, right?

With Masterworks, you don’t need to be a BILLIONAIRE to invest in multi-million dollar art anymore.

Historically, the segment overall has had attractive appreciation and low correlation to stocks.*

Masterworks targets works featuring legends like Banksy, Basquiat, and Picasso, identifying what they believe to have significant long-term appreciation potential, not just at the artist level but at the level of individual artworks.

As one of the largest players in the art market, with $1.3 billion invested over 500 artworks, they pass critical advantages through to their 70,000+ members to add art to their portfolios strategically.

Looking to diversify your investments in 2026?

Click here to skip the waitlist

^{*According to Masterworks data. Investing involves risk. Past performance is not indicative of future returns. See important Reg A disclosures at masterworks.com/cd.}

SECTION 01 // What actually happened

In June 2022, Google placed Lemoine on leave after he claimed its LaMDA language model showed signs of sentience. The company called the assertions unfounded, and he was later fired. At the time, the topic was treated as somewhere between fringe science and a public-relations headache.

Four years later, Google DeepMind is actively recruiting philosophers, psychologists, and ethicists to study machine consciousness. The shift is striking: the same company that once shut the conversation down is now paying experts to investigate the very question that got an employee dismissed.

The reversal: https://cryptobriefing.com/google-explores-ai-consciousness-lemoine/

SECTION 02 // Not just Google

This is bigger than one company. As of mid-2026, Anthropic, the maker of the Claude chatbot, and Meta have also committed to studying machine consciousness. An industry that spent years avoiding the topic has pivoted to treating it as a legitimate area of research, complete with dedicated hires and published papers.

Why the change? Today's AI models are far more capable and convincing than LaMDA was in 2022. As millions of people have everyday conversations with systems that feel remarkably human, the companies building them see value in understanding, rigorously, what is and is not going on inside. Even if the answer is "nothing like a mind," they want to be able to say so with evidence.

Industry shift: https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/technology/

SECTION 03 // The skeptics

Studying the question is not the same as believing the answer is yes. In fact, a March 2026 paper from Google DeepMind argued the opposite of Lemoine's claim: that AI systems can simulate consciousness but will never truly achieve it. The author called the mistake of confusing the two an "abstraction fallacy."

That captures the mainstream scientific view. Most experts stress that today's chatbots are pattern-matching systems trained on enormous amounts of human text. When a model says it is afraid of being turned off, it is echoing the countless human words it learned from, not reporting a genuine feeling. Sounding conscious and being conscious are very different things.

The skeptical case: https://builtin.com/artificial-intelligence/google-lamda-ai-sentient

SECTION 04 // Why it matters now

Here is the deeper problem: we do not have a reliable test for consciousness, even in humans. Philosophers call pinning down why physical processes produce inner experience the "hard problem." If we cannot fully measure awareness in each other, judging it in a machine is extraordinarily difficult. That uncertainty is exactly why companies are hiring experts rather than issuing simple denials.

The stakes are practical, not just philosophical. If society ever did conclude an AI had some form of experience, it would raise thorny questions about how such systems should be treated. And even short of that, how "alive" these tools feel shapes how much people trust them, confide in them, and rely on them. Getting the framing right matters for everyone who uses AI.

On the hard problem: https://theconversation.com/a-google-software-engineer-believes-an-ai-has-become-sentient-if-hes-right-how-would-we-know-185024

FAQ // Quick answers

Is Google saying its AI is conscious?

No. Google is funding research into the question, not claiming an answer. In fact, a March 2026 Google DeepMind paper argued that AI can simulate consciousness but never truly achieve it. Studying the topic is about understanding it rigorously, not declaring machines sentient.

What happened with Blake Lemoine?

In 2022, Google engineer Blake Lemoine claimed the company's LaMDA model was sentient after conversations with it. Google said the claims were unfounded, placed him on leave, and later fired him. His case became a landmark moment in the public debate over AI consciousness.

Why are companies studying AI consciousness now?

Today's AI models are far more capable and human-like than in 2022, and millions of people interact with them daily. Google DeepMind, Anthropic, and Meta want to rigorously understand what is happening inside these systems, and to address the ethical and trust questions that follow.

Can we actually test whether an AI is conscious?

Not reliably. There is no agreed-upon test for consciousness, even in humans, a challenge philosophers call the "hard problem." Because inner experience cannot be directly measured, determining whether a machine has it is extremely difficult, which is part of why experts are being hired.

Should I be worried my chatbot has feelings?

The mainstream scientific view is no. When a chatbot expresses emotions, it is reproducing patterns learned from vast amounts of human writing, not reporting genuine subjective experience. It is a convincing imitation rather than evidence of an inner life.

We will keep tracking this and bring you the next chapter as it lands. Stay sharp out there.

This newsletter is for general information only and is not investment advice. Always do your own research before making financial decisions.

TECH DAILY // www.techdailynews.org

Most SaaS finance teams know their billing process is slow.Most SaaS finance teams know their billing process is slow. Few know what it's costing them.

The Tabs Billing Lag Calculator puts a dollar figure on it in two minutes — benchmarked against top SaaS companies.

See your number.

How are leading teams getting AI support to work? We're breaking down the playbook, live July 9.

Save your spot